The constraint nobody mentions
What a doctor may and may not put on a website
Website design for doctors starts from a rule most agencies have never read. The National Medical Commission's professional conduct regulations restrict registered medical practitioners from soliciting patients, directly or indirectly. A factual, informational website is accepted practice. What sits on the wrong side of the line is the material most marketing templates lead with: claims of being the best or most experienced in a city, guarantees or assurances of cure, comparative claims against other practitioners, and patient testimonials used as promotional proof. We build without those by default and tell you which requested items we will not add.
The Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954 sits alongside it and prohibits advertising remedies claiming to cure a schedule of specified conditions. This catches more clinic websites than owners expect, particularly in dermatology, fertility, weight management and alternative medicine, where enthusiastic copywriting drifts into claiming outcomes.
Patient data is the third constraint. Under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, health information is personal data requiring lawful, consented processing. In practice this means enquiry forms should collect the minimum needed to call someone back — a name and a number, not a symptom history — and no patient-identifying material should sit on the site or in an unsecured inbox. If you offer online consultations, the 2020 Telemedicine Practice Guidelines govern how that is described and conducted.
None of this makes website design for doctors a lost cause. Displaying your registration number, qualifications, speciality, timings and location accurately is both permitted and exactly what a patient deciding whom to call is looking for.